The International Criminal Court at the Hague, Netherlands, has issued thinly veiled threats to topple the Jubilee government headed by President Uhuru Kenyatta and Deputy President William Ruto who are both facing charges before implausible court.

Convicted Congolese warlord Germain Katanga
The Hague based court issued its direct threat through the court prosecutor, maritime lawyer, Fatou Bensouda who said that the country leaders should learn from the conviction of Congolese warlord Germain Katanga. General Katanga has been facing charges of being an accessory in the ethnic cleansing of a diamond-rich village in Congo in 2003 where more than 200 people died. Congo is notorious for blood diamonds where diamond buyers pay rebels to cause public unrest and create a buffer zone. A small team on behalf of the diamond buyers mines the precious rock and then sell diamonds to the diamond buyers for pennies on the dollar. Germain Katanga's case drew to a close with the court reporting that the ICC judges had convicted him. Ironically, the western powers and multinationals that finance and sponsor these heinous acts to be perpetrated are never convicted.

ICC Prosecutor, Maritime Lawyer Fatou Bensouda
The two leaders who are accused of orchestrating the 2007 post election violence were overwhelmingly voted for by the Kenyan electorate winning by 50.07% of the votes cast and thereby attaining the 50% plus one threshold required to win the elections in the first round. Prior to this, the court had done all it could to bar the duo from running in the elections including media monitoring to gather evidence against them. However, finding rich media content relevant to the case has not been easy for the court.




Professor Makau Mutua
President Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto were elected on a reform platform where they promised a digital government. Through this digital marketing, they promised to institute cloud infrastructure with a data center management system complete with a computer tech support team. This was to increase government transparency as well as help root out corruption and government bureaucracy and inaccessibility.

The second threat from the court came indirectly via its mole the Dean of the University at Buffalo Law School Prof. Makau Mutua. Mutua, who is fairly unpopular in Kenya, issued the threat by referring to the current public unrest in Ukraine. The inference by the human rights lawyer and activist is seen as a direct gesture to call for civil unrest in Kenya to topple the government.
Prior to the Sochi Winter Games in Russia, there was a global uproar mainly from the western world directed to Russia due to its draconian laws and views on homosexuality. Fast forward and shift from the massive Eurasian subcontinent to Africa and to Uganda specifically. President Yoweri Museveni was under intense pressure from western powers not to assent the anti-gay bill into law. However, he went ahead and signed the bill into law and face a global backlash with US president Barack  Obama terming it morally wrong and said that it “will be a step backward for all Ugandans.”

Ugandan Strongman Yoweri Museveni
Already, homosexuality is illegal in 83 countries in the world, Kenya included. That is, half the world. Could half the world be blind? Is being a homosexual an acquired trait or an inborne permanent condition and requires special recognition? Proponents will argue for that view while opponents will think otherwise.

As it has been pointed out and again, if homosexuality is a human right, so should sociopathic and psychopathic tendencies such as being a kleptomaniac, a murderer or a rapist and even stealing. Thieves or rapist should argue that they did not acquire their habits but rather were born so. With more than half the world adhering to one of the three Abrahamic religions namely Christianity, Islam and Judaism, the opponents pose that if God plainly and blatantly condemns homosexuality as the worst transgression against him, then how can we claim a right to an evil, sin and crime?

Countries around the Globe with Anti-homosexuality Laws (in black)
Prior to scramble and partioning of Africa, homosexuality was virtually unheard of. Few areas that experienced cases of such, were mainly areas within the coastal strips that were international trade routes. Hence, when a person claims to have been born gay, how came in our forefathers' generations and their forefathers there were no people born gay? Or has there been a genetic mutation leading to people being born gay then and not now?

In my own opinion, there are no simple answers to the topic. Both sides have valid points and just like the case of which religion is better than the other or which is the correct one, it is a debate that cannot and will not end. It is a back and forth rocking. One thing though, Africa has never put the western world under duress to accept a culture that is deeply entrenched on the continent, like circumcision. Thus, it is my feeling that they should not interfere with how Africa wants to go about its cultural practices.