"Women talk as a little girl plays with a toy gun during a religious celebration. In traditional families men and women gather separately."
Iran remains largely misunderstood by many of us in the West. As a theocratic country kept under rigid social, religious, and media restrictions, it’s difficult to relate to. And in the absence of much tourism or Western media based in Iran, for many Americans the country is a blank canvas for their own assumptions and conjectures.
Iranian Living Rooms by photographer Enrico Bossan tries to close that distance. It’s a book of photographs taken in the domestic havens where Iranians, very much like the wider Western world, indulge in drink, smoking, sex and radical ideas. It’s where they express the casual lifestyles that thrive despite the preferences of Iran’s government.
To get a glimpse behind the official party lines, Bossan decided against taking the photos himself. Instead, he asked 15 young photographers already living in the country to document the Iran they know better than anyone.
“Not many [outsiders] know,” says Bossan, “because unless you are going to be traveling inside the country — say you have a friend and you have the possibility to go to a dinner with some Iranians in a private house — you will see another kind of country. I don’t like to invite someone to shoot a world they don’t know. I believe that it’s better that somebody shoot or tell a story about what they know.”
In March of 2013, as the country’s election approached, Bossan and a colleague created a private page online where young Iranian photographers could submit their portfolios. They got more than 60 applications, and after visiting the country to hold meetings and clandestine workshops the list was finally shortened to 15. Each photographer had their own ideas and proposals for the project — Bossan’s job was to curate their ideas and coach the photographers remotely as they gathered the images that eventually made up the book. One requirement was that they had to document the lives of people they knew, to share their personal view of authentic daily life.
“We didn’t want any portrait or a fake portrait, but asked them to show us their most realistic daily life,” Bossan says. “Being so realistic was a problem for some of them, because it portrays exactly what is private. To smoke, to drink, to go dancing, to make love without being married.”
Bossan became fascinated by the competing spheres of Iranian identity while visiting the country in 1989. It was ten years after Ayatollah Khomeini’s Islamic revolution and overthrowing of the Shah, and Iran had adopted strict social, religious and political regulations that included limits on public speech, imposing dress codes for women, and enforcing prohibitions on alcohol.
Despite the recent election of Hassan Rouhani — a more liberal-seeming president than Ahmadinejad was — things haven’t loosened up much. Smoking has since been outlawed, and access to the Internetremains restricted. Even dancing can be risky, but in a country where 65% of the population are under 30, subversion is inevitable.
During his visit, Bossan could sense a tension between the strict public face of post-revolutionary Iran with another way of life carrying on behind the drawn blinds of Iranian homes and private spaces. What he never saw were the photographs that illuminated this hidden aspect of its culture. “I saw more pictures, more stories related to people in the streets, revolution, religion, chador,” he says, “but no interesting work of them inside their houses, and specifically inside their living rooms.” Those are the photos he tried to get with Iranian Living Rooms.
Throughout the book’s 15 stories, we are shown the day-to-day lives of Iranian people young and old, leading lives not at all different from those led by folks throughout the States. We also see the secret costume parties, nail salons, makeup styles, and questionable habits like smoking and drinking that are common to most cultures — the difference here is that many of these activities could carry stiff penalties for the subjects of the photos. Iranian Living Rooms aims to engage Western readers with a slice of Iranian life they wouldn’t otherwise see, and in doing so demonstrate how undifferentiated the two cultures really are.
The book also allowed a young generation of Iranian photographers their first chance for international exposure. As the editorial head of Fabrica, a communications thinktank owned by global fashion giant Benetton, Bossan could offer the photographers resources for refining and publishing their work. However, the photographers also risked punishment if the project ran afoul of the government,
“To protect them, we decided not to show every picture online — we talked with them, and we talked with my friend, the curator and the writers, we proposed to have a list of pictures on an embargo to save them from any kind of attack from inside based on religion or politics.“
Even after the launch, some problems came up. Due to U.S. embargoes, the book was automatically denied payment service through Paypal, but the misunderstanding was resolved quickly. The book — its ornate cover a nod to the distinctive Iranian carpets — remains for sale online only.
Bossan plans to revisit the formula that made Iranian Living Rooms a success. To him, it represents a more honest look at its subject, less prone to the prejudices of a photographer who’s influenced by the imposed isolation between the regular folk of our respective cultures.
“We can see this in many other countries of the world,” Bossan says. “The [common] attitude about how to represent Iran is completely false in terms of the reality.”
Credit: Tajik Ali
The Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers USS Kidd and USS Pinckney are seen en transit in the Pacific Ocean in this U.S. Navy picture taken May 18, 2011. Kidd and Pinkney have been searching for the missing Malaysian airliner and are being re-deployed to the Strait of Malacca of Malaysia's west coast as new search areas are opened in the Indian Ocean, according to officials on March 13, 2014.
Military radar data suggests a Malaysia Airlines jetliner missing for nearly a week was deliberately flown hundreds of miles off course, heightening suspicions of foul play among investigators, sources told Reuters on Friday.
Analysis of the Malaysia data suggests the plane, with 239 people on board, diverted from its intended northeast route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing and flew west instead, using airline flight corridors normally employed for routes to the Middle East and Europe, said sources familiar with investigations into the Boeing 777's disappearance.
Two sources said an unidentified aircraft that investigators believe was Flight MH370 was following a route between navigational waypoints when it was last plotted on military radar off the country's northwest coast.
This indicates that it was either being flown by the pilots or someone with knowledge of those waypoints, the sources said.
The last plot on the military radar's tracking suggested the plane was flying toward India's Andaman Islands, a chain of isles between the Andaman Sea and the Bay of Bengal, they said.
Waypoints are geographic locations, worked out by calculating longitude and latitude, that help pilots navigate along established air corridors.
A third source familiar with the investigation said inquiries were focusing increasingly on the theory that someone who knew how to fly a plane deliberately diverted the flight.
POSSIBLE SABOTAGE OR HIJACK
"What we can say is we are looking at sabotage, with hijack still on the cards," said that source, a senior Malaysian police official.
All three sources declined to be identified because they were not authorized to speak to the media and due to the sensitivity of the investigation.
Officials at Malaysia's Ministry of Transport, the official point of contact for information on the investigation, did not return calls seeking comment.
Malaysian police have previously said they were investigating whether any passengers or crew had personal or psychological problems that might shed light on the mystery, along with the possibility of a hijacking, sabotage or mechanical failure.
As a result of the new evidence, the sources said, multinational search efforts were being stepped up in the Andaman Sea and also the Indian Ocean.
LAST SIGHTING
In one of the most baffling mysteries in modern aviation, no trace of the plane nor any sign of wreckage has been found despite a search by the navies and military aircraft of more than a dozen countries.
The last sighting of the aircraft on civilian radar screens came shortly before 1:30 a.m. Malaysian time last Saturday (1730 GMT Friday), less than an hour after it took off from Kuala Lumpur, as the plane flew northeast across the mouth of the Gulf of Thailand. That put the plane on Malaysia's east coast.
Malaysia's air force chief said on Wednesday an aircraft that could have been the missing plane was plotted on military radar at 2:15 a.m., 200 miles northwest of Penang Island off Malaysia's west coast.
This position marks the limit of Malaysia's military radar in that part of the country, a fourth source familiar with the investigation told Reuters.
When asked about the range of military radar at a news conference on Thursday, Malaysian Transport Minister Hishammuddin Hussein said it was "a sensitive issue" that he was not going to reveal.
"Even if it doesn't extend beyond that, we can get the co-operation of the neighboring countries," he said.
The fact that the aircraft - if it was MH370 - had lost contact with air traffic control and was invisible to civilian radar suggested someone on board had turned off its communication systems, the first two sources said.
They also gave new details on the direction in which the unidentified aircraft was heading - following aviation corridors identified on maps used by pilots as N571 and P628. These routes are taken by commercial planes flying from Southeast Asia to the Middle East or Europe and can be found in public documents issued by regional aviation authorities.
In a far more detailed description of the military radar plotting than has been publicly revealed, the first two sources said the last confirmed position of MH370 was at 35,000 feet about 90 miles off the east coast of Malaysia, heading towards Vietnam, near a navigational waypoint called "Igari". The time was 1:21 a.m..
The military track suggests it then turned sharply westwards, heading towards a waypoint called "Vampi", northeast of Indonesia's Aceh province and a navigational point used for planes following route N571 to the Middle East.
From there, the plot indicates the plane flew towards a waypoint called "Gival", south of the Thai island of Phuket, and was last plotted heading northwest towards another waypoint called "Igrex", on route P628 that would take it over the Andaman Islands and which carriers use to fly towards Europe.
The time was then 2:15 a.m. That is the same time given by the air force chief on Wednesday, who gave no information on that plane's possible direction.

The sources said Malaysia was requesting raw radar data from neighbours Thailand, Indonesia and India, which has a naval base in the Andaman Islands.
Credit:CREDIT: REUTERS/US NAVY/SEAMAN APPRENTICE CARLA OCAMPO/HANDOUT